Beiträge getaggt mit: "lawyers"

Lessor’s obligation to pay damages in the absence of any clarity concerning the requirement to give notice of defects – Leasing law

GRP Rainer Lawyers and Tax Advisors in Cologne, Berlin, Bonn, Bremen, Dusseldorf, Essen, Frankfurt, Hamburg, Hanover, Munich, Nuremberg, Stuttgart and London www.grprainer.com/en conclude: In its judgment of March 27, 2013 (Az.: 25 U 59/12), the Berlin Court of Appeal ruled that a lessor potentially renders itself liable to pay damages to a lessee if it does not point out to[Weiterlesen…]

14. November 2013 Allgemein

M&A: Due Diligence analysis when buying a company – Corporate Law

GRP Rainer Lawyers and Tax Advisors in Cologne, Berlin, Bonn, Bremen, Dusseldorf, Essen, Frankfurt, Hamburg, Hanover, Munich, Nuremberg, Stuttgart and London – www.grprainer.com/en conclude: Someone acquiring a company always has a disadvantage in comparison with the vendor of the company in terms of vital company information such as earnings or sales. That is why the Due Diligence process has been[Weiterlesen…]

13. November 2013 Allgemein

Compensation for a decrease in equity can only be in the form of damages paid to the company – Corporate Law

GRP Rainer Lawyers and Tax Advisors in Cologne, Berlin, Bonn, Bremen, Dusseldorf, Essen, Frankfurt, Hamburg, Hanover, Munich, Nuremberg, Stuttgart and London – www.grprainer.com/en conclude: This principle, which the Federal Supreme Court [BGH] has emphasized again and again in its on-going case law, also applies if the company is dissolved through the opening of bankruptcy proceedings (BGH, file number: II ZR[Weiterlesen…]

29. Oktober 2013 Allgemein

Unilaterally incriminating provisions in divorce settlements – Family Law

GRP Rainer Lawyers and Tax Advisors in Cologne, Berlin, Bonn, Bremen, Dusseldorf, Essen, Frankfurt, Hamburg, Hanover, Munich, Nuremberg, Stuttgart and London – www.grprainer.com/en conclude: In its ruling of April 11, 2013 (File number: II-4 UF 232/12), the Superior Court [Oberlandesgericht / OLG] of Hamm decided that unilaterally incriminating provisions in divorce settlements, such as waiving the right of pension equalization[Weiterlesen…]

28. Oktober 2013 Allgemein